Representations of History in Chinese Film and Television

Interesting new site maintained by Gotelind Müller-Saini from the Institute of Chinese Studies at the University of Heidelberg, Germany. Arguing that discourse on history does not just occur in the academy, this new site explores the way Chinese history is portrayed and represented in popular media. The site is in its infancy, with three works under consideration (including the very popular Zou Xiang Gonghe 走向共和–Towards a Republic) but Professor Müller-Saini is looking to expand the site and welcomes submissions from interested contributors. A site worth checking out.

Midterms

And I’m not talking about the elections…I have a stack of ‘em on my desk and they’ve gotta find their way back to the students by the time I get on the plane to LA this weekend. Right now, the exams are just sitting there in my inbox staring at me–like some sort of evil serpent…a cobra, maybe.

There are only so many times I can read things like: “The unsuccess of the landownership cause for a transformation.” (Yes, that was a native speaker.) Just now I found out that, “Ashikaga lead a coop against the emperor.” Wow, it takes a tough man to drive chickens into battle against the forces of the emperor…

(Sound of my head slowly and quietly banging on the metal desk….)

Xinjiang and the territorial legacies of empire

To slake its thirst for natural resources, the PRC–like the Qing Empire whose territorial legacy Beijing continues to claim–looks west.

To satisfy the energy demands of its fast-growing coastal cities, China is building a 4,200-kilometer, or 2,600- mile, pipeline from here that will traverse the craggy steppes and sparsely populated villages of the old Silk Road, and run directly to Shanghai and possibly to Beijing. But the manner and terms under which the government is extracting resources from Xinjiang angers many of the region’s 7.5 million ethnic-Uιghur Muslims.

Many Uιghur want independence from China, and they accuse Beijing of using the energy resources to tighten its grip on Xinjiang. They also say the region receives little benefit from its own energy reserves because energy production is controlled by China’s state-owned companies, consumed by China’s coastal cities and taxed in a way that the central government gets most of the revenues.

The IHT article above gives a little background into Beijing’s claims to Xinjiang, mentioning the founding of Eastern Turkestan in the 1930s and the subsequent annexation of the territory by the PRC in 1949. It leaves out that Xinjiang was, of course, a part of the Qing empire though the

Chinese Sociologist: Wife swapping=Bad

Quick update 1/13/07: A site called Buzz Feed.com picked up this story but I wanted to point out that the post was discussing a historical situation NOT a prediction for the future. (I’m a historian, not a futurist.) ——————————————————————————–From the Reuters China desk–who must be in the middle of a slow news cycle this week–comes a story that the Chinese sociological establishment has weighed in with the opinion that ‘sex is good, but swapping wives is bad.’ Chinese sociologists said that the country should promote bolder attitudes towards sex, but that wife-swapping was off the agenda, state media reported on Monday.

Chinese attitudes towards sex have relaxed in recent decades, triggering a boom in extramarital relationships which the Communist Party has blamed on bourgeois mores imported from the West.

“Wife-swapping should not be promoted to the public as it will lead to the spread of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases,” the China Daily quoted Zhang Feng, a family planning official, as saying at the fourth Guangzhou Sex Culture Expo at the weekend.

The historical angle here? I coincidentally just finished reading an interesting article by Matthew Sommer on polyandry among the poorest members of Qing society.* The

An Empire on the Cheap

Provocative essay in the LA Times last month by Niall Ferguson, author of Colossus: The Price of America’s Empire. Ferguson’s basic argument is that if America wishes to pursue a policy around the world that apes the empires of the past, then it needs to start looking at why those empires did or did not succeed. Less than a century ago, before World War I, the population of Britain was 46 million, barely 2.5% of humanity. And yet the British were able to govern a vast empire that encompassed an additional 375 million people, more than a fifth of the world’s population. Why can’t 300 million Americans control fewer than 30 million Iraqis? Three years ago, as the United States swept into Iraq, I wrote a book titled “Colossus,” which offered a somber prediction, summed up in its subtitle, “The Rise and Fall of the American Empire.” My argument was that the United States was unlikely to be as successful or as enduring an imperial power as its British predecessor for three reasons: its financial deficit, its attention deficit and, perhaps most surprisingly, its manpower deficit. Rather cruelly, I compared the American empire to a “strategic couch-potato … consuming on

日历

November 2006
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930