CDT last week posted a series of interviews with Chinese journalists, including one with a (more or less) anonymous Chinese journalist. (Read other interviews here, here, and here.) It’s a good read, as this particular journalist gives, to my mind, a pretty balanced perspective on the problems between Chinese nationalists and the Western media, while providing a good accounting of the misconceptions and misunderstandings from both sides of the ledger. I did like his take on nationalism, in part because it more or less jibes with what I’ve been writing this past year:
CDT: WHAT APPROACH WOULD YOU PREFER THE CHINESE TO TAKE?
Journalist: First of all they should figure out where this kind of nationalism came from. I think there are two reasons. The first is that the Chinese people have been educated by this kind of patriotism or nationalism in their textbooks, which teach how China had suffered from its past history. They tell about China’s humiliating history, being invaded by Japan and western countries. This kind of education easily gives its people an impression that they should fight against any disrespect or invasion. So people become very sensitive about these international issues.
The second part is that most of the so-called nationalists are young people. They have not experienced too much in their lives. They have not experienced frustrations about jobs, about bad treatment,and other injustices from the government side. So they think it’s legitimate for them to stand by the government unquestioningly and they regard this kind of nationalism as patriotism. I feel that patriotism is a positive word and nationalism is negative. Patriotism makes people like heroes, but nationalism is kind of a blind patriotism. Based on these two reasons, I think the effective way to deal with the situation is to release more truth and allow the information to flow freely and more freedom of speech and expression, or let the average Chinese people know it’s normal for outside people to protest. We should deal with it with confidence and tolerance and try to dissolve any misunderstanding between both sides.
In any case, the whole series is well worth reading in its entirety.
I can’t emphasize enough the value of China Digital Times, it is the first place I look every morning and the staff and volunteers who maintain the site deserve a huge amount of credit for compiling and indexing the cacophony of China-related writing in print and on the web. Kudos.

3 responses so far ↓
1 舒杰瑞 // Aug 4, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Speaking of journalists, here’s a funny link courtesy of China Law Blog:
http://time-blog.com/china_blog/2008/07/a_reporters_guide_to_covering.html?xid=rss-china
2 Jeremiah // Aug 4, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Yeah, I saw that. Also check out Kaiser Kuo’s list of suggestions over at Danwei.
3 DavidofSanGabriel // Aug 4, 2008 at 1:52 pm
I quote from the article:
“…most of the so-called nationalists are young people. They have not experienced too much in their lives. They have not experienced frustrations about jobs, about bad treatment,and other injustices from the government side. So they think it’s legitimate for them to stand by the government unquestioningly and they regard this kind of nationalism as patriotism.”
How true. A couple of months ago, I posted on this blog “The Amateur’s Guide to Understand China. My seventh point went as follows:
” Yes, Chairman Mao made a few boo-boos. Who hasn’t? Things are much better now than they were 20 or 30 years ago. Any notion that the “unpleasantness” of 1959-61 was a result of anything but natural causes is lying western propaganda.”
I should amend this post as follows: “Be sure to praise Chairman Mao as a fearless man of unquestioned genius, the greatest revolutionary leader ever, whose bold social experiments such as the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution have been unfairly maligned by those who wish to demonize China.”
If you are a teacher and repeat the above sentiments in front of your students, their respect for you will grow tremendously. However, and I cannot emphasize this too heavily, make certain to never, under any circumstances utter such statements before any Chinese old enough to have actually lived under the wise and benevolent rule of the Great Helmsman!
Leave a Comment