<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: Iranian Fenqing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://granitestudio.org/2009/06/20/ayatollah-ali-khamenei-iranian-fenqing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://granitestudio.org/2009/06/20/ayatollah-ali-khamenei-iranian-fenqing/</link>
	<description>A Qing historian reads the newspaper...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 03:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickpetes</title>
		<link>http://granitestudio.org/2009/06/20/ayatollah-ali-khamenei-iranian-fenqing/comment-page-1/#comment-12483</link>
		<dc:creator>rickpetes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granitestudio.org/?p=1276#comment-12483</guid>
		<description>I think looking at these situations as specific to anyone country leads to the wrong conversation.   I think it might be far more productive to view them as generic power relationships.   China, Iran, GB, USA, etc. all reflect a ruling oligarchy (in the US, just look at the inbreeding of our elite families) trying not so much to maintain stability but to maintain power.  I think you can do this with just about any hierarchical organization be it empires, nation states, local unions, etc.  Further, I suspect that these oligarchies all enjoy being the &quot;big frog in a small pond&quot; (to use a Southern US colloquialism), and hence the conflicts between them at the expense of the citizenry.  I also think they pretty much all feel threatened by the power that technology is pushing down to the common man, whether it be modern telecommunications, weapons, microbiology, etc. , all are threat to the status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think looking at these situations as specific to anyone country leads to the wrong conversation.   I think it might be far more productive to view them as generic power relationships.   China, Iran, GB, USA, etc. all reflect a ruling oligarchy (in the US, just look at the inbreeding of our elite families) trying not so much to maintain stability but to maintain power.  I think you can do this with just about any hierarchical organization be it empires, nation states, local unions, etc.  Further, I suspect that these oligarchies all enjoy being the &#8220;big frog in a small pond&#8221; (to use a Southern US colloquialism), and hence the conflicts between them at the expense of the citizenry.  I also think they pretty much all feel threatened by the power that technology is pushing down to the common man, whether it be modern telecommunications, weapons, microbiology, etc. , all are threat to the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://granitestudio.org/2009/06/20/ayatollah-ali-khamenei-iranian-fenqing/comment-page-1/#comment-12476</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granitestudio.org/?p=1276#comment-12476</guid>
		<description>Chen Xiaomei&#039;s book &lt;i&gt;Occidentalism&lt;/i&gt; gets into this kind of rhetoric - and how critics of the state line often end up re-using standard Orientalist trops of the despotic and backwards East -  in some interesting ways.

in many ways, tehran 2009 seems to be having a 1989 moment. should be interesting to see how this plays out, esp. WRT reformist clerical factions, and the military as an institution. 89 could have gone a lot of different ways with just a few different upper-level decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chen Xiaomei&#8217;s book <i>Occidentalism</i> gets into this kind of rhetoric &#8211; and how critics of the state line often end up re-using standard Orientalist trops of the despotic and backwards East &#8211;  in some interesting ways.</p>
<p>in many ways, tehran 2009 seems to be having a 1989 moment. should be interesting to see how this plays out, esp. WRT reformist clerical factions, and the military as an institution. 89 could have gone a lot of different ways with just a few different upper-level decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChinaMatt</title>
		<link>http://granitestudio.org/2009/06/20/ayatollah-ali-khamenei-iranian-fenqing/comment-page-1/#comment-12439</link>
		<dc:creator>ChinaMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granitestudio.org/?p=1276#comment-12439</guid>
		<description>Always nice to see rhetoric without supporting evidence. Amazing how you can use similar words to win any argument simply because one ignores facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always nice to see rhetoric without supporting evidence. Amazing how you can use similar words to win any argument simply because one ignores facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J B</title>
		<link>http://granitestudio.org/2009/06/20/ayatollah-ali-khamenei-iranian-fenqing/comment-page-1/#comment-12436</link>
		<dc:creator>J B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granitestudio.org/?p=1276#comment-12436</guid>
		<description>To be fair to the CCP (and the Ayatollah) I think it&#039;s a pretty common tactic for any government, even more so for any nationalist- just blame foreigners for anything bad.  In the US, many politicans- from both parties- blame China for at least some of US&#039;s economic woes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair to the CCP (and the Ayatollah) I think it&#8217;s a pretty common tactic for any government, even more so for any nationalist- just blame foreigners for anything bad.  In the US, many politicans- from both parties- blame China for at least some of US&#8217;s economic woes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FOARP</title>
		<link>http://granitestudio.org/2009/06/20/ayatollah-ali-khamenei-iranian-fenqing/comment-page-1/#comment-12428</link>
		<dc:creator>FOARP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granitestudio.org/?p=1276#comment-12428</guid>
		<description>Actually, keep the content pretty much the same and the recently promulgated &quot;Six Whys&quot; are indistinguishable from the average Charles Liu or Bianxiangbianqiao post. Give them a look here: 

http://cmp.hku.hk/2009/06/19/1668/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, keep the content pretty much the same and the recently promulgated &#8220;Six Whys&#8221; are indistinguishable from the average Charles Liu or Bianxiangbianqiao post. Give them a look here: </p>
<p><a href="http://cmp.hku.hk/2009/06/19/1668/" rel="nofollow">http://cmp.hku.hk/2009/06/19/1668/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

