Google is the new opium

There are days when the state media in China just can’t help drunkenly staggering along that fine line between “self” and “self parody.”

Few events from the 19th century have such a grip on Chinese indignation as the Opium Wars of 1840-1842.  In PRC historiography, the unequal treaties forced upon the Qing government at the end of the war mark both the start of the modern era and a “century of humiliation.”  Patriotic education, media, and movies reinforce this emotionally charged linkage of drugs, violence, and forced submission in the collective consciousness

Most recently, British protests over the 2009 execution of Akmal Shaikh, a Briton convicted of smuggling drugs into China, sparked a strong backlash with few commentators failing to take up the flag of resistance against a modern opium war.

Last Friday, the People’s Daily Online edition (中文) brought opium into the digital age.  CMP provides this translation:

In the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, the British East India Company, through the monopolization of trade, the sale of opium and open plunder, accomplished great works for England in its development of an “empire on which the sun never sets.” Marx once said concerning the British East India

City Journal: If you’re going to bash Beijing, at least pretend like you actually sent somebody to visit…

Um, Summer Palace? Lama Temple? Temple of Heaven? I’m not saying the Beijing Municipal Government are paragons of historic preservation, but Jesus…open a f—–g copy of Fodors why don’t you?

Bad History: China’s Economic Policies and the Opium War

This is a longish post…

A long time ago, self-congratulatory citizens and academics of Western Europe and the United States would explain the ludicrous assault on Qing Imperial sovereignty in the 19th century as the simple and sad story of the emperor who said no.  Poor deluded Qianlong missed an opportunity to liberalize his trade policies and join the ‘comity of nations’ when he dismissed the noble, upstanding diplomat MacCartney with a sniff, a wave, and a haughty letter to His Royal Majesty King George III which boasted that, “Our Celestial Empire possesses all things in prolific abundance and lacks no product within its own borders. There was therefore no need to import the manufactures of outside barbarians in exchange for our own products.”

Of course this narrative was a poppycock fairy tale to justify the armed expansion of trading and other privileges by the North Atlantic powers in the 19th century.

The Qianlong Emperor wasn’t declaring a new policy, rather he was describing an economic reality: The Qing Empire at the end of the 18th century was a continent-sized trading network of markets and hubs, mines, farms, plantations, factories, merchants, banks, guilds, and relatively sophisticated systems of finance and

Why the number “12″ matters: The end of the Qing and my first pub quiz

I’ve been told that my only talent is as a repository of useless trivia (hence: the history degree) and have also on more than one occasion been accused of being something of an obnoxious know-it-all (Thanks, Mom!), and…I like pubs. So this was an idea whose time had come, right? Wrong?

The Party and History or “Glenn Beck and Xi Jinping: Twins of Different Mothers”

With the 90th anniversary of the CCP just around the corner (okay, next July…), the Party brass and their academic ass sucks got together for a high-level history hootenanny.  At the kick-off, China’s Heir-Apparent-But-We-Still-Can’t-Admit-That-Publicly-Yet Xi Jinping  called for more education regarding the Party’s history.

Xi said the Party, having experienced the tests of revolution, development and reform, “successfully united and led the Chinese people to achieve miracles under an extremely complicated circumstance.”

“Over the past 89 years, the CPC contributed greatly to the nation’s independence, unification and the people’s well-being,” he said.

Well, I for one am relieved…because THAT’S a story that hasn’t been told enough times through China’s education, media, or entertainment industry.

I suspect though that Xi’s main message had less to do with trumpeting a triumphalist narrative of Party history than about his accompanying admonition against those who sought to “distort or smear the Party’s history.”

For the CCP-impaired or if you are otherwise unaccustomed to Zhongnanhai-speak, allow me to translate:

“People are starting to see through all of our bullshit, so we need to pump some ex-lax into the cattle feed and get the shovels ready.”

It’s not clear if Xi was responding to an actual threat within